Quantcast
Channel: Megas Alexandros
Viewing all 1040 articles
Browse latest View live

The Lion Horoscope of Mount Nemrud

$
0
0
I already talked in detail about the unique location of MountNemrud in MountNemrud, as close as you can come to the gods and referred to the Lion Horoscope in my discussion Alexandria was born under a regal star.

MountNemrud is a huge funeral monument built for Antiochus I Commagene, at an elevation 7,000 feet in eastern Turkey and must already have been a very special place in the first century BC. The two terraces of this tomb are directed towards the summer and winter solstices, and it has been recently figured out that the colossal (now beheaded) statues on the eastern side faced the Regulus Star on the 23rd of July, i.e. the date of Antiochus’ ascent to the throne as mentioned in the inscriptions on the monument. What’s more, Antiochus explicitly refers to Alexanderthe Great as his ancestor in the abovementioned inscriptions. 
 
The Lion Horoscope that once adorned the west terrace is absolutely unique. From what I understand it is now locked up inside a grave chamber that itself has not yet been excavated. Meanwhile the wildest stories go around about the significance of this relief.
The conclusions published on the site of Learning Sites are open for any discussion, to say the least. This is what they say:
  • The site possesses the earliest extant Greek Horoscope in the form of a striding lion -   a reading of its date firmly fixes the site in time, a rarity in archaeological research. 
  • The inscriptions on the back of the ancestor stelae provide conclusive evidence, available nowhere else in the ancient world, for the sequence of Seleucid, Macedonian, and Persian rulers back to Alexander the Great and Darius I, making the stelae on Nemrud Dagi crucial historical documents.
  • Evidence exists here for demonstrating for the first time that Alexander was called "the Great" already in antiquity.
  • The fusion of Greek and Persian deities and religious rituals at Nemrud Dagi, evident in the sculptural iconography and the inscriptions, provides stunning evidence of the extent to which the Mithraic religion had moved from the Near East toward Europe, marking here in Commagene the crucial crossing from East to West of this popular counterthrust to the emergence of Christianity.
  • The attention Antiochus' craftsmen paid to precise historical details of regalia on the figures depicting rulers hundreds of years earlier than the Hellenistic age is unprecedented.[Read the complete story at the Learning Sites]. 

The relief, measuring 1.7 x 2.4 meters is in itself rather intriguing. It shows a majestic looking male lion covered with nineteen stars (in the shape of eight pointed rays) set in such a way that they closely resemble the constellation of Leo. Above his back three stars are depicted with sixteen points instead of eight and these are recognized as planets, i.e. Mars, Mercury and Jupiter labelled by their Greek names Pyroeis Herakleos, Silboon Apollonos and Phaeton Dios respectively. There is also an upturned crescent of the moon under the lion’s neck symbolizing the New Moon. The star above this moon disk is Regulus, always associated with royalty throughout history from Babylonian, Persian, to Greek and Ptolemaic kings. 
 
It is clear that in many antique cultures the lion was commonly used to symbolize power, magnificence and dominance. It was first popular in the Near East where we find lions on the walls of many palaces (Babylon, Susa, etc.) and on border stones. The lion definitely represented royalty at the times of the Commagene rulers. Also many lions were found in Macedonia and Greece as symbols of royal power, later adopted by the Romans. 

The labelling of Lion Horoscope may however be a far searched one. What we actually have here are three elements: the lion or the constellation Leo (representing royalty, military and political power), an inscription identifying the three planets (Mars, Mercury and Jupiter) and the crescent symbolizing the moon goddess (source of fertility known as Tyche/Commagene). According to one theory the Lion Horoscope was meant to contribute to the self-divination of King Antiochus I, placed at the centre of this relief and depicted as a conquering lion. But then, there are thousand and one other theories losing themselves between astronomy and astrology although with interesting retro-active calculations placing the constellations in the skies of two thousand years ago. 

More details but not necessarily convincing elements can be found in this article byA. Öncü Güney, “An Iconological Study on the Lion Horoscope Relief of Nemrut Dag Hierothesionand on the site of Learning Sites mentioned above.

Via Egnatia, a road to remember

$
0
0
It was during my first visit to Philippi (Greece) that I noticed the inscription “Via Egnatia” next to what appeared to be a Roman road running a couple of meters below the modern road and parallel to it.

Till then I only knew about the main roads of Italy, like the Via Appia, the Via Emilia, Via Aurelia, Via Flaminia, the Via Trajana and the Via Ostiensis to name only a few, but the Via Egnatia?

Since it bordered the Roman Agora at Philippi it must have been important and I soon found out that it ultimately connected to Rome. Built in the 2nd century AD, it started back in Byzantium, running through Thrace, Macedonia (Philippi, Kavala, Amphipolis, Thessaloniki, Pella, Edessa, Florina) over the mountain passes to Lake Ohrid; from there over a difficult stretch along the Genusus River to the Adriatic Sea at Dyrrachium (originally Epidamnos), today’s Durrës in Albania opposite the port of Brindisi on the Italian Peninsula; hence the connection to Rome. Like most Roman roads, it was about six metres wide and in many places it was covered with large stone slabs. In total it covered a distance of 1,120 kilometres. According to Strabo it was named after Gnaeus Egnatius, proconsul of Macedonia who seems to have initiated its construction, although that has not been proven yet. The road was expanded and improved many times and for centuries it remained Rome's vital link with its eastern provinces.

[picture from Wikipedia]

The Via Egnatia made history when Julius Caesar and Pompey marched over it fighting for supremacy during the Great Roman Civil war that lasted from 49 to 45 BC. Leading to the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC, the armies of Antonyand Octavian pursued Cassius and Brutus along the same road and several milestones have been recuperated recording the many crucial events of its life-span. By the fifth century AD large sections, especially at its western end fell in disrepair and the Via Egnatia became more a name than an actual highway.

The modern version called Egnatia Odos now links Igoumenitsa on the Adriatic coast to Greece’s eastern border with Turkey - a distance of 670 km and a worthy ode to the ancient Via Egnatia.

[Egnatia Odos]

Many portions of the antique highway have survived and the best known, I think, is to be found in Philippi. But this soon may change with the discovery of a marble paved road at a depth of three meters during the construction works for the metro in Thessaloniki. A great number of tombs and graves ranging from the fourth century BC to the fourth century AD once lined this road and yielded a great number of offerings that accompanied the dead. So far, 1,500 pieces of jewellery in silver, gold and copper, have been unearthed, as well as gold coins from Persia, glass perfume bottles, terracotta vessels and even eight golden wreaths.

Was Hannibal superior to Alexander? No way!

$
0
0
There really is no way to compare Alexander and Hannibal, I know, but I lately watched a program about the exploits of Hannibal crossing the Alps with his elephants, in which it was mentioned that Hannibal achieved the greatest exploit ever by crossing the Alps. Is that so? How about Alexander crossing the Hindu Kush? This was simply too much for me and I went in search of some facts and figures to defend the case of Alexander.

I will not deny that Hannibal leading his army and most of all his elephants over the Alps in 218 BC (at the beginning of the Second Punic War with Rome) was a quite unique and daring undertaking, but there is no way this achievement could match or surpass Alexander’s march across the Hindu Kush roughly some one hundred years earlier.

The figures recorded by Polybius reveal that Hannibal travelled with 40,000 foot soldiers, 4,000 horsemen and 37 elephants. Alexander on the other hand, having left Macedonia with 40,000 soldiers and 1,500 cavalry, but lead an army of 100,000 men, an unknown number of cavalry and horses and no elephants over the unforgiving heights of the Hindu Kush. 

On top of that, there is no way to compare the Alps with the Hindu Kush. Once again I let the figures speak for themselves. The highest top of the Alps is the Mont Blanc reaching 4,810 meters, while the highest summit of the Hindu Kusch lies at 7,690 meters. Consequently, the passes over the respective mountain ranges are situated at quite different altitudes as well. Scholars have argued at length about the most probable route Hannibal could have followed. Based on the reports from Polybius and Livy, it is generally agreed that the lowest pass, the Col de Montgenèvre between Briançon in France and Susain Italy was the most probable choice, located at 1,854 meters. Alexander on the other hand used the Khawak Pass at 3,848 meters in 329 BC when he moved his huge army from the Kabul Valley in Afghanistan to Bactria in the north. Two years later he crossed the Kindu Kush in the opposite direction to enter Pakistan, using the much easier yet more famous Khyber Pass situated at 1,070 meters.

Of course, crossing the Alps by itself was an exploit and the Romans themselves felt safe behind this solid natural barrier. Crossing them with elephants was absolute madness (Hannibal was probably driven by his deep hatred for the Romans) and in the end it seems that only two dozen of them survived the expedition. Yet, that by itself is not enough, in my eyes, to place him above the Macedonian King! Alexander's march is a heroic one in its own right, generally not stressed enough as it is very hard for us in the West to imagine the overall travel conditions through the Hindu Kush range and passes and what its challenges are. Alexander’smen suffered dearly, especially in 329 BC as winter lingered on much longer than usual and the troops were often caught in blizzards where men and beast froze to death if they dared stop moving.

More often than not Alexander is forgotten in our western history while he opened up much of Asia. For ten years, his amazing campaigns lead him all the way to India across unforgiving deserts, wide and fast flowing rivers, and daring mountain ranges of which the Hindu Kush definitely is the highest. The story of Hannibal’s elephants or the conquests of Julius Caesar in France, Germany and Britain are much more familiar to us than Alexander’s challenging and daring march through Asia. That is not fair!

[Pictures from Wikipedia]

Pergamon is simply huge

$
0
0
Pergamon, whose first settlement goes back to the 8th century BC, lies on a strategic hill above the modern city of Bergamain western Turkey. The location was so well chosen that even Alexander the Great did not consider attacking this fortified city, but marched instead around it with the purpose of isolating it. After his death, his general Lysimachus and by then King of Thracechose Philetairos of Pergamon to secure his share of Alexander’s treasury and, as can be expected, this Philetairos used it in 281 BC to found his own kingdom. Twenty years later he left his realm to his nephew Eumenes I who ruled from 263 till 241 BC. After Eumenes, this splendid city fell in the hands of his heir, Attalus I (241-197 BC). The Attalid rulers were allies of Rome, much to the discontent of Philip V and Perseus of Macedonia who both fought over this wealthy territory during the three Macedonian Wars. Thanks to their support against the Seleucids, the Attalids were rewarded with extended possessions in Asia Minor. By 188 BC, Pergamon and with it the Pergamon Empire had grown considerably and outshone all others, certainly as far as Hellenistic art was concerned. The last Attalid ruler, Attalus III, surrendered Pergamon to the Romans in 133 BC, thus becoming the capital of their Provincia Asia.

During one of my very first and not too brightest guided trip, I sat on the bus pounding over the brilliant history of Pergamon trying to visualize Alexander's approach. We manoeuvred through the narrow old and wide modern streets of Bergama, till we reached a smaller road that rose up towards the four kilometres long city wall above the steep slopes. Square bulges overgrown with grass revealed that there was still a great deal of stone blocks hidden there awaiting excavation. This impressive wall is the work of Eumenes II (197-159 BC) who wanted to build an Acropolis that would even outshine that of Athens– nothing less. 

The size of Pergamon is simply huge and my misfortune was that I had to follow my unforgiving guide who just marched on, ignoring the streets, columns and arches on our way – a very frustrating experience. It’s hard to get my bearings, maybe because excavations since 1875 were done by German archaeologists who like to leave things the way they find them unless they can take them apart as they did with the Altar of Zeus to bring the pieces to their museums. It comes as quite a shock to me when my guide points out the barren space once occupied by that very altar in the landscape. Not a single hint is left of that once so proud building! Such a pity since it is considered to be one of the most beautiful altars ever built and a very unusual one as well since it never served as a crepidoma to any temple at all. This enormous marble offer-table dating from 180 BC stood on a huge plinth that also supported the double row of Ionic columns. The Pergamon Museum in Berlin houses this great altar and the visitor has to use all his imagination to mentally transpose that building to this poor wind stricken hill.

I give up trying to locate where I am, running after my guide and secretly vowing to come back one day. I am impressed by the Temple of Trajan that was completed after his death by Emperor Hadrian, measuring 68 x 58 meters and easily recognizable by its Corinthian columns, with an extra colonnade running all around the outside of the temple.

The Library, on the contrary, needs some guesswork. In antiquity is was one of the richest in the world and its 200,000 parchment scrolls went to Alexandria, as Marc Antony’s wedding gift to his Queen Cleopatra. I think it is worth mentioning that until that time, all writing was done on papyri. It was only when Egypt decided to stop its export that alternative solutions had to be found. It was here in Pergamon that the idea was born to use sheep and goat skins instead. These hides were smoothened with pumice and cut into handy sheets. That is how our parchment, the name borrowed from the city of Pergamon, was born. A strange paradox of life to see parchments enter Egypt, the land of the papyri.

After passing a large marble column carrying the symbols of Asclepius, i.e. two intertwined snakes facing each other across a wheel, I reach the Asclepion Complex. It was believed that since snakes shed their skins to be ‘reborn”, the patients would shed their ailments and illness to recover their health. The Asclepion was founded by the great healer Galen (Aeleus Galenus), who was born in Pergamon in 130 BC, where he studied medicine. Asclepius, the Greek god of health and medicine, was known since the 4th century BC and Galen made great use of his knowledge not only as a doctor but also as a psychologist, although the very word did not yet exist. Galen had a thorough knowledge of human anatomy, physiology and neurology. He had acquired his knowledge by studying wounded gladiators at the healing shrine of Asclepius. As the patients were led through a long vaulted corridor that had at regular intervals circular openings in the ceiling to let in the light, he may have resorted to the therapeutic use of water and music. Water from a nearby source runs down the stairs and follows the entire length of the corridor wall - the longest such passageway I’ve ever seen. I’m not sure if the echo under these vaults was beneficial to the patients and if I can believe my guide who suggested that the patients were drugged with opium in their drinking water, meaning that by the time they reached the end of the corridor they were so confused that they wandered around in the labyrinth that awaited them at the end of this dark passage. Of course, there were caretakers to guide them further to the Temple of Asclepion where the priests gave them psychoanalysis two thousand years before Sigmund Freud was born! Next to the temple lies the theatre belonging to the Asclepion Complex, in front of which one can still see several sacred pools that even today are generally filled with water in spring. The entire complex was without any doubt a top notch spa in antiquity! Well, even now, it is quite rewarding to walk here and imagine what must have been going on. 


In the centre of Pergamon one simply can’t miss the large theatre, the steepest in the world. The oldest parts date from the 3rd century BC but, as always, it has been improved and enlarged several times, particularly under Emperor Caracalla. The portico of this theatre measures no less than 246 meters and is approximately 16 meters wide. Unique is that this portico was removable since it covered the adjacent street. Strange however that it seated only 15,000 people, less than the theatre in Ephesos although this theatre in Pergamon looks much larger. 

It is frightening to walk down the steep steps for the precipice is luring below. From the top rows however the visitor has a commanding view over the land around this acropolis and easily can appreciate the strategic location of Pergamon. Undoubtedly the very location of this city must have impressed Alexander. I definitely have to come back one day, were it only to put the many remains of so many buildings on the map of my mind, and more so after seeing its treasures in Berlin.

At the Pergamon Museumof Berlin the entire Altar of Zeus has been carefully reconstructed, meaning that all the friezes that ran around it have been put in their right sequence. However the visitor is looking at them inside-out for instead of actually walking around the altar, the elements have been placed against the wall surrounding the central part with the flight of stairs leading to the platform. Somehow I find it hard to figure this out properly. But then there is a wonderful reduced model in what looks like marble reflecting the full impact of what this famous altar must have looked like. Such a shame there is close to nothing left in Pergamon though …

Alexander the Great, a young man’s strive to conquer the world.

$
0
0
The author of this book published in Dutch under the title “Alexander de Grote. De strijd van een jonge man om de wereld te veroveren” (ISBN 9789055139859) is not known or at least not mentioned although it somewhere says that the text is by Merit Roodbeen – why this mystery? In any case, this was reason enough for me not to buy it, but then I received it as a gift. I read it, of course, for after all this is about Alexander the Great and one never knows what treasure might still be hidden somewhere. Well, not here that is certain.

All in all, a decent effort is made to cover Alexander’s entire life, from his youth in Macedonia and his early years of kingship to his untimely death shortly after having lost his dearest friend Hephaistion. The key battles at Granicus, Issus and Gaugamela are treated, followed by Darius’ death, the capture of Bessus, the conquest of Bactria and Sogdiana till the King reaches India where his army doesn’t want to go any further. After crossing the Makran desert he arrives back in Babylon and deals with the Opis revolt. This is nothing new, simply the classical story of Alexander’s life.

As I expected, the book entirely lacks incentive, passion or personal approach. This is very sad for the person of Alexander the Great is terribly exciting, fascinating and mysterious at the same time, yet none of this transpires in this book.

Alexander’s army crossing Mount Climax

$
0
0
“Alexander now left Phaselis. Part of his forces he dispatched over the mountains towards Perga, along tracks made for him by the Thracians to facilitate what was otherwise a long and difficult journey. He himself marched with picked troops along the coast, a route which is practicable only in northerly winds – during southerlies the beach is impassable. It had been blowing hard from the south before he started; but (by the grace of God, as both he and his staff felt) the wind went round into the north and made the passage quick and easy.” This is what Arrian tells us. Plutarch, however, only mentions a “heaven-sent stroke of fortune”. 

Well, whatever the case, I have been on the lookout for this mountain path taken by the bulk of Alexander’s army. The coastal road north from Phaselis to today’s Antalya is winding around the flanks of the mountains offering very few openings to the hinterland. Each year more and more tunnels are being built for the comfort of the many tourists driving west from Antalya to the many resorts and hotels that fill the narrow stretch of land at the foot of TahtaliMountains. Somehow I had the feeling that if I looked close enough I would spot the army’s access road. 

Freya Stark (see: Alexander’s Path) did an excellent job crisscrossing these mountains over and over, exploring every single pass till she found a plausible route Alexander's army could have followed through eastern Lycia during the winter of 334/333 BC. She carefully studied all the possibilities and found his tracks all the way to Phaselis. From here, to reach Perge,Alexander chose the shorter passage along the seashore that turned out to be as difficult had not the winds and the gods played in his favor. Most of the army, however, as told by Arrian marched over the TahtaliMountains following the tracks cleared by the Thracian engineers. 

This is fascinating territory as far as I’m concerned as for centuries the Tahtali Mountains served as separation-line where Greece occupancy ended and Persian rule started. The highest snow-capped peak was obviously claimed by the Greeks and appropriately named MountOlympos– what else? With its 2,366 meters it is also known as Mount Climax and it still commands the scenery. 

One day in early January, I find myself at the embouchure of a half-dried up Kesme River looking inland at the ever changing moods of these mountains. The way upstream is lost behind a modern bridge at a tiny village with a minaret pointing to the mosque at the foot of the abrupt rising rock-wall. In the ever changing light I even discover odd rounded rocky knobs rising straight up from the valley floor. They remind me of the sugarloaf mountains around Rio de Janeiro. That is where Lycia begins. Clouds throw threatening shadows over the landscape giving the sun a chance to highlight details otherwise shrouded in the low hanging clouds or blending in with the overall view. 

Standing here on the banks of the river mirroring the mysterious snow-capped giants, my thoughts drift off to Alexander who had to march his troops over this rough chain of mountains while he himself would be wading through the water somewhere further north from here. The gods are said to have bowed to him, nothing less. I have seen that very shore from the gulet sailing from Phaselisto Antalya, and that left a deep impression as I in turn bowed to Alexander’s courage and determination!

It was nothing more than a gut-feeling that I thought this was the place where the Macedonians started their perilous climb, but afterwards I learnt I was right. I should have gone upstream to investigate the possible roads and paths for myself. The end of the KesmeValley is still luring - maybe I’ll drive up there one day soon!

Across the Hellespont by Richard Stoneman

$
0
0

Richard Stoneman’s approach to discover Turkey in his book Across the Hellespont (ISBN 978-1-84885-422-2) is quite unique and the subtitle “A Literary Guide to Turkey” in fact says it all.

Rather than a dreary sequence of texts, the author ably summarizes Turkey’s rich history inserting pieces of literature ranging from antiquity to modern writers. As history progresses, the author shares a panoply of documents, letters and poems written by the countless travelers who from the 17th all the way to the 20th century came in touch with the Ottoman Empire of which close to nothing had transpired to the West.

The main part of the book is centered on Istanbul (Stamboul or Constantinople as the city was known before) but also the western part of modern Turkey with the regions of Ionia and Lydia, Lycia and the now popular Turkish Riviera are widely illustrated by those early visitors.

Moreover, this book provides plenty of information to whoever wants to dig further into Turkey’s rich history. All the quoted texts are extremely well referenced and the most curious mind can certainly pick his choice from the elaborate Bibliography and Guide to Further Reading listed at the end of the book, from biographies to fiction, from modern accounts to guidebooks, from Turkish history to more specialized books about Istanbul

In spite of these bits and pieces, Richard Stoneman manages to write a coherent and captivating story about this land on the crossroad between East and West that fascinated and still fascinates so many of us.

More Treasure Finds from ancient Macedonia

$
0
0
It is wonderful news that in spite of its poor financial state, excavations in Greece are still on-going. To my greatest satisfaction, the most recent discoveries are coming from the Vergina area, ancient Aegae.

The pieces recovered from five different tombs are very refined and one of them could have belonged to King Cassander, the bloody ruler of Macedonia who took the Macedonian crown after killing Alexander’s mother, wife and son(s). Himself being the son of Antipater, Alexander’s regent while campaigning in the east, Cassander married Alexander’s sister Thessaloniki, establishing the Antipatrid dynasty. 

Another quite important tomb shows a large underground room whose walls are decorated with garlands of ivy and flowers. Based on the impressive ceramic objects and an iron sword found in this tomb it can be dated to 420-410 BC and could well belong to King Perdiccas II, one of Alexander’s ancestors who died in 413 BC.

Yet another Macedonian tomb was discovered showing Doric columns and a façade that is similar to that of the tomb that supposedly belongs to Alexander IV, the son of Alexander the Great.



[Attic lekythoi and Funeral mourning representation found at the Royal Necropolis of Aegae, Vergina. Pictures from Archaeology News Network, Credit: ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ/ΥΠΠΟ/STR]

In total twenty tombs were excavated ranging from the 4th to the  3rd century BC . Although these burial sites have been plundered in the past, they still yielded some impressive artifacts.

Further to the south, in ancient Corinth, a hoard of 51 Macedonian gold coins has been found in a cavity in the rocks. The coins featuring Philip II were minted in PellaandAmphipolis in Macedonia, while those showing Alexander the Great come from Amphipolis in Greece, Mileteand Tarsus in Asia Minor, Salamisin Cyprus and from Sidon in Phoenicia. The hoard was concealed shortly after 330 BC when Alexander was still in Asia and a Macedonian garrison was posted in Corinth to protect the isthmus.


[Picture from Pinterest fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net]

New speculation about Alexander’s tomb

$
0
0
It is beyond doubt that whoever finds the tomb of Alexanderthe Great will go down in history as having made the discovery of the century, so the hunt is still on. Theories about the location and or/ discovery of Alexander’s tomb make the headlines on a more or less regular base. Its seems that in Egypt in alone at least 140 unsuccessful searches have been recognized, and only a few months ago the gamble took place in Amphipolis, Greece (see: Nonsense about Alexander’s grave in Amphipolis). Another theory was exposed in a YouTube film (see: TheLost Tomb of Alexander the Great in Egypt?), yet again non-conclusive. Over the past years, Andrew Chugg has developed a possible theory that Alexander’s remains were taken to the San Marco Basilica in Venice as they were mistakenly identified as pertaining to the Evangelist by the visiting Venetians (see: The Lost Tomb of Alexander the Great and The Quest for the Tomb of Alexander the Great).


[Picture from World News Daily Report]

The latest news this time comes from Alexandriain Egypt, the city where Alexander was buried as recorded by several two thousand years-old sources. His tomb must be there “somewhere”. An article published in the World News Daily Report mentions how a team of Polish archaeologists researching the crypt of an early Christian church have found a richly decorated mausoleum which they attribute to Alexander based apparently on an inscription reading “King of Kings, and Conqueror of the World, Alexander III”. It sounds too good to be true, if you ask me - as if someone kindly left his business card.

The site shows mixed influences from the different cultures of Alexander’s empire: Macedonian, Greek, Egyptian and Persian. Strangely enough, said article specifies that the monument held a sarcophagus made of crystal glass (how convenient!) that was broken by looters at some point in the past but apparently before the third or fourth century when the tomb was sealed off. Archeologists also found 37 broken bones pertaining to a male adult. Carbon dating should shed some light on the age of the male in question, while other unspecified tests are undertaken to determine whether these bones could be those of Alexander. Beside the bones and shattered glass, only a small number of artifacts have been recovered - mainly pieces of pottery - said to belong the Ptolemaic and Roman eras.

Personally I find the tone of the article not too enthusiastic and the so-called proofs rather vague. The inscription mentioned above, for instance, may have been taken out of its context as they say that the texts were written partially in Greek and partially in hieroglyphs.

It was Ptolemy, Alexander’s general and later king of Egypt as Ptolemy I Soter who kidnapped Alexander’s remains while underway to Macedonia and had them temporarily entered in Memphis. It was his son, Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who finished the construction of the Mausoleum for Alexander in Alexandria and who transferred his remains to this city where it laid in state for many centuries and was visited by Roman emperors like Julius Caesar, Caligula and Caracalla. The very existence of the Mausoleum is traceable till the fourth century, but with the rise of Christianity and Islam it slowly fell in oblivion. Some Arabian travelers however reported to have seen Alexander’s tomb as recently as the ninth and the sixteenth century but don’t give any information about its location.

In short, the location of the tomb of Alexander the Great is still unknown and I believe that finding it will only happen by chance.

Amazing charioteers

$
0
0
Speaking of a charioteer, the tall and slender bronze statue from Delphi immediately comes to mind. Standing in front of this unique figure with his large in-laid eyes and delicate eyelashes is an unforgettable experience. 

Erected either in 478 or in 474 BC to honor the victory of a chariot team in the Pythian Games that were held every four years at Delphi for the Pythian Apollo, it incarnates the typical conventional style of the late Archaic period as well as that of the early Classical ideal although we easily tend to look beyond his rather rigid pose simply because his face is so fascinating. This charioteer is supposed to have stood behind the chariot drawn by four or six horses, assisted by two grooms forming a quite imposing group in its days. It is believed to be made in Athens and shows certain similarities with the Piraeus Apollo, but nothing is certain.

But there is another charioteer, although much less known who is at home at the Museum of Motya in Sicily. This is a most remarkable marble statue dating from around 440 BC, which by its pose alone expresses great confidence. It may have been made by a Greek master and scholars even think that Phidias may have been its creator. This work is much more realistic, fully belonging to the Classical period. As it was found buried in a shallow grave on the road to the sanctuary his face and vital parts have been abraded, but otherwise he is amazingly well preserved. He lost the bronze band around his chest and his arms which he held in quite a defiant pose. In fact he carries his entire body in a rather provocative pose and the tight long dress gives him a sexy appearance.

On second thought, this statue may not be that of a charioteer but rather represent the Phoenician god Melgart (equal to the Greek Heracles), the supreme god of Tyre, or even an unknown Carthagian hero. Personally I favor the idea of a charioteer, were it only because of the elongated lower body and his dress which corresponds entirely to his Delphian counterpart.

Both statues also come together in Sicily as the inscription found on the limestone base of the Delphian charioteer states that the bronze was dedicated by the tyrant of Gela, a Greek colony in Sicily to thank Apollo for helping him to win the chariot race (Polyzalos dedicated me … Make him prosper, honored Apollo). The marble charioteer on the other hand was extracted from Sicilian soil more recently.

It never ceases to amaze me how close the relationship among the peoples around the Mediterranean was. In the fifth century BC, Sicily was indeed very wealthy and the local rulers could easily have afforded the most magnificent offerings to the gods. The Motya charioteer is proof for that.

[Picture of the charioteer from Delphi is taken from Wikipedia]

Magna Graecia, the forgotten Greek legacy

$
0
0
Many, many years ago I travelled to southern Italy off season to visit Pompeiiand Herculaneum. Unfortunately my lodging address was much further away than what the travel brochure made me believe and I wound up way south of Salerno. This is how I discovered the existence of sites like Paestumand Velia, once part of Magna Graecia. Till then I had not heard of Magna Graecia and I had no idea what it actually meant for when we talk about Greece, we automatically think of mainland Greece and Athens in particular but not of any colonies or overseas settlements.
That trip was my very first encounter with Greek civilization, even if it had been adapted and reshaped by the Romans. In those days before internet, before color TV and few books with colored pictures, my perception of Pompeiiand Herculaneum was based on lots of imagination but I was over the moon to be able to investigate these places by myself. It was February, a time no tourist in his right mind would venture to those parts of Italy and I remember that only seven cars were parked outside Pompeii. In short, I was not disturbed or hampered by any crowd, meaning that conditions were right to get a true feeling of these antique remains.  I found the same emptiness in Herculaneum where I thought I still could inhale the smell of the burnt wooden beam that have survived, much unlike Pompeii. The Archeological Museum of Naples war nearly empty, making me feel lost till I came face to face with Alexander on the famous mosaic from the Villa of the Faun. It felt like a private audience with Alexander the Great, an unforgettable experience!

As I said, this was my very first “archeological” trip and I learnt many precious lessons for the future. The very first lesson was that I should prepare a trip, inquire locally about what to see and what the opening hours are. Second lesson: get all the information you can about a museum before going there as I spent several hours in Naplesbefore reaching those rooms with Alexander and other precious objects I really wanted to see. Third lesson: do your homework. Since then, I did all that and never had to regret missing anything major.

As I said, I was staying much too far away, actually a good two-hours drive from Salerno over winding local though beautiful roads. But there was an advantage to this unfortunate situation for I was close to the ancient sites of Elea (modern Velia) and Poseidona (modern Paestum). This was my introduction to Magna Graecia. Life takes strange twists at times …

It was here that I heard for the first time how an impressive number of Greek colonies were founded all around the Mediterranean. For various reasons often including famine or overpopulation at home but also frictions and competition between the rising city-states, induced many Greeks between the eighth and fourth century BC to emigrated in search of new opportunities overseas. After all, the Greeks were always seeking business opportunities and perfectly understood the advantage of  establishing good trade relations with foreign countries. Settlements varied widely from the Black Sea, including Crimea, and Asia Minor to North Africa and the Iberian and Italic peninsulas. One of the most flourishing area was to become known as Magna Graecia or Great Greece, i.e. the coastal region of southern Italy which generally also includes Sicily, heavily colonized by the Greeks during the 8th and 7th century BC.

Basically there were two types of  colonies like those that existed as an independent city-state and the widely spread trading-colonies. We have to thank these Greek colonies for spreading Hellenistic culture as most cities around the Mediterranean somehow have Greek roots.

Paestum was my first city to visit and it looked familiar right away since I discovered it was the setting of the well-known Sissi II movie in which the Empress of Austria, who according to history went to Greece to recover from tuberculosis, is walking among these very temples! I have not returned there since but in those days the only buildings standing were the three temples: the Temple of Ceres, the Temple of Poseidon (Neptune) and the Basilica. Beside that the main roads had been exposed with the Decumanus exiting the city at the Porta Marina in the West and the Porta Sirena in the East, while the Cardo linked the Porta Aura in the North to the Porta Giudizia in the South – all gates clearly visible in the still standing city walls. The central Forum and part of the Amphitheatre had been excavated, but that was about all.

I was very impressed by the compact and sturdy Basilica or possible Temple of Hera which counted an unusual nine columns in its façade while all temples basically have an even number of columns (another thing I learnt). For this reason the temple has only one row of columns running in the middle of the cella. Striking is that in this Basilica built around 500 BC the optical correction of the columns was apparently not yet known and looking carefully we clearly see how the columns seem to lean inwards.

The middle temple dedicated to Poseidon (or maybe also to Hera) was built about one hundred years later and the optical corrections in the architecture of this edifice have been carried out to perfection. Time wise it corresponds to the construction of the Parthenon in Athens when the purity of proportions reached its peak. No wonder that this Temple of Poseidon steals the show in every way! A curious oddity used in only few temples is the two rows of superposed columns inside the cella, the place where the god resides. These columns are especially slender and elegant and seem to make the temple feel very light. Greeks in antiquity would laugh at our admiration for these ruins which they would have torn down without mercy, but they have not seen how the color of the travertine stone turns to golden as the material aged and hardened over the centuries. It is now a most wonderful spectacle to watch how sun and shadows play with the ocher-colored colonnades set against a steel-blue sky.

The Temple of Ceres on the other hand is more austere, probably because like for the Basilica, the construction material comes from a different quarry than for the Temple of Poseidon. Smaller than the two other temples, it stands a little to aside and has the oddity of counting 6x13 columns instead of the normal proportion of 6x12. There are exceptions to every rule, even when it comes to building temples, it seems.

Poseidonia was founded early in the sixth century BC by Acheans and by the end of the fifth century the city was conquered by the Lucanians who more or less followed the customs of the early settlers. In 273 BC, however, after siding with Pyrrhus against Rome and sharing his defeat, it became a Roman city under the name of Paestum. It continued to flourished till the fourth century AD, at which time decline set it and by the Middle-Ages Paestum was entirely abandoned.

The story of Elea is slightly different. It was founded by Greeks from Phocaea who fled Asia Minor around 538-535 BC after a siege by the Persians. As opposed to Paestum, Elea was not conquered by the Lucanians but fell to Rome at the same time in 273 BC. More important is probably that it was the home of the Eleatic School founded by the philosopher Parmenides at the beginning of the fifth century BC that included Zeno of Elea and Melissus of Samos– maybe even Xenophanes but that is not proven.

The very location of Velia as I saw it was quite striking. The light was still gentle and the skies were pale blue as they generally are in spring. The landscape was very green for the valleys were filled olive trees, fig trees and vines which the Greek had introduced. The mimosa was blooming and the small mountain oranges were ripe for picking. In a distant the snow capped mountains of the Apennines kept watch over these lands, unchanged over the centuries. What a choice place to found a city!

High on the Acropolis of Elea stood an Ionic temple of which only the crepidoma remains and a few stubs of columns as most of the material has been reused in the construction of the medieval tower that stands on top of it, commanding the view from afar. To reach the Acropolis, I remember walking over a most beautiful Greek road made of cobblestones with intermittent horizontal slabs to keep them in place and flanked on each side by a deep gutter (4th-3rd century BC). This road ends at the Porta Rosa a magnificent example of a vaulted gate built by the Greeks and the only one of its kind to be found in Magna Graecia.

In the lower part of Elea, the Porta Marina was the eye-catcher. In antiquity Elea was an active port that has as is often the case been silted up and now lies much further inland. The surprise was to find this southern city gate flooded after recent rainfall making it look like a gate to the sea. The five kilometers long city walls were built in the sixth century BC and two centuries later they were reinforced with sturdy towers to defend Elea against a possible attack by the Lucanians. Explanations were non-existing but I managed to locate some Roman Bath which turned out to be built by Emperor Hadrian. There was also a vast Roman residence and other unidentified remains. Looking for pictures of Elea on the internet I’m surprised to see that a Roman theater and an Asclepion have been excavated but I see no traces of the aqueduct that I discovered there, partially running underground and covered by two slabs of stones in between the cisterns that used to filter the water before reaching the lower city. Well, enough to be intrigued and high-time for me to return and see it all for myself.

In any case, my visit to Paestum has set in motion my life-long love for and understanding of Greek art. First in the Classical Period but mostly during the following Hellenistic era a degree of perfection was reached that was never surpassed in later centuries by any civilization. We are blessed that in spite of time and repeated wars so many of the buildings, statues, pots, jewelry, and other remains have come to us. The many temples in Magna Graecia tend to give us the impression that the colonizers were even more Greek than the Greeks themselves!

The Ladies of Morgantina

$
0
0
Alexander lived during the rich days when the Classical Greek art had reached its apogee. We can only guess what beautiful architecture and statues he may have grown up with and may have surrounded him. In whatever I see, I always wonder if it is something that Alexander may have known or if it was the product of his spreading of Hellenism.

Once in a while though, I find myself confronted with striking objects or out of common statues and on such occasions these questions surface once again. This is exactly what happened in the small but very fine Archaeological Museum ofMorgantina,Sicily that exhibits quite a few special artifacts.


For now, let’s focus for a moment on a group that is generally called The Ladies of Morgantina. It is the strangest pair of women I’ve ever seen, in fact only marble acroliths: two heads, three feet and three hands. The statues themselves would have been made of wood, now gone, to which the extremities were attached. The faces have that serene expression, typical for the classical period with almond-shaped eyes and enigmatic smile, which led experts to date them to around 530 BC. The heads and hands are perfectly well preserved while the feet are strangely worn, perhaps because of repeated caresses by their worshippers. The Ladies’ hair and their jewelry like diadems and earrings were probably made of some precious metal and the statues themselves were wrapped in a mantel of linen or wool, the head covered with a veil. They must have looked extremely true to life.

Lots of speculations and debates have surrounded these statues but in the end most scholars agree that both are female and could represent Demeter and her daughter Persephone. The position of their fingers suggests that they must have held an object in their hands.

The way they sit today in Morgantina’sMuseum does them credit. A simple wire construction hidden by dark tulle outlines the body of these goddesses while the spotlights lay the accent justly on the acroliths, making them again very respectable as they stare at their visitors from the height of their podium. They have a very dignified posture and pose, accentuated by the correct light and their timeless smile.

It is a great pleasure to see these goddesses right here where they belong after having traveled around for many years. They were smuggled out of the country after illegal digging in the second half of last century and eventually found their way to the United States. Shortly after 2005 they luckily came home to Morgantina and it is no surprise that they are a prized possession of the museum.

[For more pictures click on this link to the Morgantina Museum]

Plutarch’s Lives or The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans by Plutarch

$
0
0
Plutarch's Lives (ISBN 978-0375756764) is an excellent reference book and very worthwhile reading as he describes the lives of prominent Greeks and Romans individually and  draws parallels between them according to their status or function.

This translation by John Dryden (revised by Arthur Hugh Clough) may seem old-fashioned and in a way it is. Yet it somehow adds an extra flavor to the antique texts. It is not as easy to read as any other contemporary translation of Plutarch's work but it has a feel of being close to the original script and the original way of understanding what Plutarch meant. A native English speaker will not find it so difficult to read as a foreigner, yet it is definitely worth the effort.

As far as Alexander the Great is concerned, Plutarch is the only author from antiquity to tell us something about Alexander’s youth – all the others start right away with his conquests and generally at his crossing to Asia Minor, leaving out the fierce campaign he had to lead at home before crossing the Hellespont. 

It is rather obvious that Plutarch compares him with Julius Caesar ...

More about Magna Graecia: a testimony from Calabria

$
0
0
The Province of Calabria is generally seen as the stepchild of Italy although very few people ever took the trouble to visit this region so rich in history and culture. Sorry to add that I haven’t been there either … yet.

Situated at the southern tip of Italy, it was widely settled by the Greeks in the period between the eighth and the fourth century BC (see:Magna Graecia, the forgotten Greek legacy) and the modern cities of Reggio (Rhegion), Rosarno (Medma), Lamezia Terme (Terina), Crotone (Kroton), Catanzaro (Scylletium), Caulonia (Kaulonia), Locri (Epizephyrian Locris) and coastal cities of Bruttium (Scyllaeum andPetelia) have their roots back in those early days.



Among those forlorn towns there is Riace near the toe of Italy that merits all our attention as it made history in 1972 when an amateur snorkler and diver discovered by chance two magnificent bronze statues – one of Italy’s greatest discoveries of the past 100 years. As we don’t know who they represent, they are simply called the “Riace A” and “Riace B” – not very evocative, of course.


Except for a few vague architectural remains, no shipwreck that could give any indication about their provenance or destination was found, which evidently fueled further speculations. Meanwhile it has been established that the statues were made about thirty years apart: “Riace A” was apparently created between 460 and 450 BC whereas “Riace B” fits between the years 430-420 BC. So far, archeologists have not been able to agree whether they represent warriors, athletes or gods. Both are larger than life-size and measure nearly two meters. Both men are naked; the older man (Riace B) wears a helmet and the younger one (Riace A) shows his wavy hairdo. They may have carried a spear and shield; both are made of cast bronze but their eyelids and teeth are of silver, their nipples and lips of red copper, while their eyes are composed of ivory, limestone and a paste of glass and amber. 

Scholars do not agree about the makers of these bronzes. “Riace A”, a man conscious of his good looks, may have been made by Myron of Eleutherae, an Athenian based artist of the mid 5th century BC; “Riace B” on the other hand, depicts a more mature man in a relaxed pose with a kind look in his eyes and could be from the hand of Alkamenes, a pupil of the great Phidias.

These magnificent bronzes made headlines again recently when after four years lying on their backs pending some repair and cleaning as victims of budget cuts and lots of red tape, they finally are back at the Archeological Museum of Reggio Calabria. They are now once again standing in all their glory for everyone to see.

At the end of last century both statues went on a triumphant pilgrimage through Italy to cities like Rome, Florence and Milan, but this kind of travel will not be repeated for the World Fair in Milan next year because their overall condition is far too delicate. Their exhibition for the G8-top in Genoa held in 2001 had already been refused. So, whoever wants to see these unique bronzes will inevitably have to travel to Reggio Calabria– an opportunity to visit more of Magna Graecia on the way?

Who is Alexander?

$
0
0
Good question, especially since most people have no idea. The answer however is not that easy. Alexander the Great was the greatest general ever and he was one of the greatest conquerors of the world creating an empire that reached from Greece to India and from the Caspian Sea to Egypt. His exploits have been handed down over the centuries and are still fueling heavy discussions 2,500 years after his death. Yet his fame among the general public is overtaken by people like Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan or Napoleon to name only a few – a very unfortunate fate for such a great man!

Alexander was born as the son of King Philip II of Macedonia and Queen Olympias, meaning that on his father’s side he was a descendant of Heracles and on his mother’s side of Achilles. He ascended the throne at age twenty after his father was murdered in 336 BC. It took him two years to secure the borders of Macedonia and to obtain recognition from the other Greek city-states to act as their leader in his campaign to free the Greek cities of Asia Minor still under Persian rule. By capturing all the harbors of the eastern Mediterranean he inevitably made the Persian navy inoperative and obsolete. He faced the Great King Darius III during the Battle of Gaugamela, and came out victorious although he had not captured the king. That happened only after a wild chase ever further east in the heart of Central Asia. Having acquired the title of King of Kings he pursued his dream east to the Indus where his army mutinied and refused to march eastwards any longer. Alexander had no choice but to turn back. He died on 323 BC in Babylon from an unconfirmed illness – not the heroic death he evidently must have wished for. During his years of kingship he outdid and outshone every king before him and after him.

His life and exploits have reached us only second handedly as the original texts by his court historians Callisthenes, the nephew of Aristotle, and Eumenes, his father’s secretary, were lost in time. King Ptolemy I Soter of Egypt, from Macedonian stock and one of Alexander’s generals, wrote an Alexander biography which although lost was still available at the time Plutarch, Arrian, Diodorus and Curtiuswrote their history. There exist, of course, other less complete literary sources to which we must add information provided by archeological excavations and discoveries – an ongoing business.

Unfortunately there is no easy way to summarize Alexander’s all too short life that is cramped with battles, sieges, campaigns and endless marches over hills, across rivers, deserts and steep mountain ranges. The further east he moved, the more challenging his operations became as he ventured through generally unchartered territories. 

So, it may be best to illustrate his life and exploits piece-meal, just as I discovered it over the years. A good place to start is obviously Pella in modern Greece, the city where Alexander was born in the early summer of 356 BC. In fact, his birth coincided with the fire of the Temple of Artemis in Ephesos and it is said that the goddess was to busy helping Alexander into this world neglecting her temple duties. Legend or not, the fact remains that Alexander made quite an entrance on the stage of life!

We know very little about his youth which is told nearly exclusively by Plutarch. Every schoolboy however is familiar with the story of Alexander taming the wild horse Bucephalus. It happened during the yearly horse-market where KingPhilip was presented with an unusual Thessalian horse. The horse reared up ignoring all commands and Philip found it unmanageable and vicious, not the kind of animal he would trust in the heat of a battle. But the ten years old Alexander had other ideas and wanted to have this horse at all costs, much to Philip’s annoyance no doubt as he was himself a connoisseur in this matter. Anyway, the King gave his son a chance. Alexander had noticed that the horse was afraid of his own shadow and turned him to face the sun, whispered sweet words in his ear and was able to calm him down. This is how he won his confidence and managed to ride him to the greatest joy and probably relieve of his father and all those present. This may have been the time when Philip exclaimed “look for another kingdom, my son, Macedonia is too little for you”. Alexander called his horse Bucephalus, meaning Oxhead after the white blaze on his head. Since that day, Alexander and Bucephalus were inseparable. When his magnificent mount died of old age in India, he even named a city after him.

Plutarch also tells us another anecdote about young Alexander who, apparently in his father absence, received a group of ambassadors from Persia. The prince impressed them by asking the right questions which were not childish at all. He inquired, for instance, about the roads leading to the heart of Asia, about their King and how he carried himself towards his enemies, what size of army he could muster and things like that. Useless to say that the Persian delegates were very much impressed and full of admiration for the son of Philip.

Alexander’s first preceptor was the austere Leonidas, a kinsman of Queen Olympias, followed by Lysimachos the Acarnanian who called himself Phoenix and Alexander Achilles. When the young prince was about twelve years old, his father sent for Aristotle, the most learned and celebrated philosopher of his time and decided that the temple of the Nymphs near Mieza was the appropriate location for his teaching [see: Mieza, Alexander's schooling]. With boys his age, he received not only the doctrine of Morals and Politics but also those theories which the philosophers professed for oral communication only to the initiated. Alexander’s interest for medicine must have come from Aristotle also, a skill he used throughout his life to treat his sick friends.
 
Even KingPhilip must have noticed and recognized how bright and intelligent his son was as he trusted him with the seal of Macedonia while he led an expedition against Byzantium. Alexander was only sixteen years old at the time and proved up to his role of Regent when he even fought the rebellious Maedi, founding his first city, Alexandroupolis, in the process. 
 
At theBattle of Chaeroneaopposing King Philip’s forces against an alliance of the Greek city-states led by Athensand Thebes, who felt that Macedonia under Philip was gaining too much power, he entrusted his son with the command of the left wing.At eighteen years of age, the young prince and his cavalry killed the unbeatable Theban Band to the last man, eliminating the centuries-old entity for good. Athens who had not willingly faced Macedonia as their equal in the repeated peace negotiations was now ruled by the master of all the free city-states that so deeply had believed in their own freedom. That winter, Philip summoned them all to send their delegation to Corinth and soon the The League of Corinth was born. This meant that each state individually had to swear not to harm any other member of the Common Peace (or Philip or his descendants for that matter) and not to interfere in their internal affairs. They also swore not to become ally with any foreign power that could damage any member of the Treaty. No member could undertake any operation that might endanger the peace or overthrow its constitution.

This is, in a nutshell the baggage Alexander had accumulated when his father was brutally murdered during the wedding of his daughter Cleopatra,Alexander’s sister, in the summer of 336 BC. Alexander, now twenty years old became King of Macedonia and Hegemon of all of Greece, except Spartawhich always wanted to stand apart. His task was now to continue in his father’s footsteps who had already made preparations for an expedition to the east in order to free the Greeks of Asia Minor.

[Picture of Philip and Alexander from Oliver Stone's movie Alexander]

Syracuse rivaled with Athens to be the most powerful city

$
0
0
Syracuse always had a magical sound, tucked away down south of Italy on the island of Sicily that like no other was and still is at the cross-roads between east and west, between north and south.  This strategic location not only shows on the map of the Mediterranean but more so when you actually visit the island. That is exactly what I finally did after dreaming about it since my teenage years. Finding myself in the very heart of Syracuse, it is hard to describe what I feel or expect. I’m totally overwhelmed as if I were floating on some imaginary sea, the currents taking me to the core of its great past.

It may come as a surprise to learn that Syracuse at one time rivaled with Athens for the power over the Greek world, but as part of Magna Graecia, this wasGreece away from Greece which we have to approach from a totally different angle. Syracuse was the very first city to be settled in Sicily and it were the Corinthians who in 733 BC disembarked on the small island Ortygia just off the coast. Pretty soon it was attached to the mainland by a causeway, creating two practical harbors, one on the southwest and one on the northeast side. Syracuse grew quickly and then created colonies of its own like Akrai, Kasmenai, Heloros and Kamarina.

With its expansion came the need for some form of government and not being happy with the Corinthian aristocrats who imposed themselves from the onset, Syracuse turned to Gelon, tyrant of neighboring Gela, a colony of Rhodians and Cretans that had settled as early as 688 BC. Gelon took his task seriously and moved the larger part of Gela’s population to Syracuse, which became his capital in 485 BC. The Syracusans must have felt they made the right decision for Gelon was able to defeat the Carthaginians at nearby Himera five years later, though it must be said he did so with the help of his father-in-law, Theron of Akragas (modern Agrigento). This at least kept the matter in the family. The victorious Gelon had taken thousands of prisoners of war which he now used as slaves and the finest craftsmen among them were employed to build a temple at the summit of Ortygia,dedicated to Athena to thank her for his victory. It probably was finished in 480 BC.

This is the temple we can still admire in the old town of Syracuse as an integral part of the cathedral (Duomo), whose façade was rebuilt in 1728-1754 in Sicilian-Baroque style after several earthquakes had damaged the Norman entrance. Isn’t it amazing that a place of worship is being used and re-used continuously for 2,500 years? This temple was erected in the Doric style, six columns wide and fourteen deep, with doors inlaid with ivory and gold. The larger than life statue of Athena would have ruled over the inside, an imposing figure made of Paros marble with her face, hands, feet and weapons of pure gold. The tympanum of the temple was enhanced with a golden shield that reflected the sunlight, serving as a landmark to the sailors. A pure statement of the city’s wealth, no doubt, till it was taken down by a too greedy Roman politician, Caius Verres some four hundred years later.

In Byzantine times the temple was converted into a church and the cella-walls were pierced to create open arches while the space between the columns was walled up. Under the Arabs the church became a mosque, and traces of this period can be seen on the outside walls where the Muslims added crenellations above the Greek triglyphs and metopes. With the arrival of the Normans, the roof was raised and narrow windows were inserted. The chestnut ceiling is a later Spanish addition (using the hard chestnut wood from the Etna region). I read all this information but still have no idea what to expect from this sanctuary that actually is right around the corner of my hotel.


The Baroque façade flanked by statues of the apostles Peter and Paul carved in pure Carrara marble doesn’t betray what the inside has in store for me. Once I cross the threshold of the Duomo, I am stepping into another world. It literally takes my breath away as I’m immediately confronted with the interior of a Greek temple – or at least as close as one can come to it. I’m actually standing in the temple’s opisthodomos, looking into the north apse between the outer columns (now walled) and the wall of the cella that has been opened up by the Byzantines to let the light flow through the inner sanctuary. The narrow windows the Normans inserted near the capitals of the Doric columns filter the late-afternoon sunlight. There are more windows above the vaulted walls of the inner cella where stylish chandeliers add to the eerie atmosphere of this church. It is hard to figure out what is Greek, Byzantine or Norman but the end-result is absolutely superb and harmonious. Along both sides of the modern nave we can read the Latin inscription “Ecclesia Syracusana prima Divi Petri filia et prima post Antiochenam Christo dicata”, meaning “The church of Syracuse is the first daughter of divine Peter and the first to be dedicated to Christ after Antioch”, in other words a confirmation that this is the oldest Christian community in Europe.

Two columns from the original opisthodomos of the cella are flanking the entrance door, and another twelve columns on the north side and nine on the south side are still in situ, sturdy Doric fluted columns almost nine meters high and two meters in diameter! On the Via Minerva, around the corner of the piazza, the twelve columns of the north side are also visible from the outside including their architrave and triglyphs above which the Muslim crenellation has been added.

The floor of the Duomo is covered with colored marble and I wonder about the dating of the different designs, interrupted by colorful tombstones that carry coats of arms. The main altar is typical 16th century with a painting of the Nativity of the Virgin, which I find somehow out of place, as much as I am absorbed by the antique Greek remains. In the eastern corner is a chapel, the Cappella del Crocifisso, with ceiling fresco’s that remind me of the Sixteen Chapel at a very early stage. There are two more chapels along the south wall, but these are unfortunately closed at the time of my visit.

Walking back to the entrance, I get an unexpected glimpse of the north aisle and notice three commanding statues optically in the perfect place between the columns and the openings in the cella-wall. They could well be antique gods or goddesses as far as I am concerned but on closer look they are 15th century’s statues of St Lucy, a Madonna with Child, and St Catherine of Alexandria, made in pure white Carrara marble.











Amazing how the eye and the mind can be tricked by this amalgam of architectural styles and religions. A true jewel though …

Haggling over the silver hoard of Morgantina

$
0
0
The main treasures exhibited at the Museum of Morgantina are, strangely enough, the result of illegal diggings that found their way via clandestine channels to museums in the United States. The Ladies of Morgantina which I discussed earlier were eventually located by experts at the University of Virginia Art Museum


Yet, that is not all for through the same channels a 15-piece silver hoard was smuggled from the so-called House of Eupolemos on the site of Morgantina in Sicily to show up at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Evidence for the looting goes back to the 1980’s but discussions back and forth with the Italian authorities dragged on for years. Finally in 2006 an agreement was reached between the Metropolitan Museum, the Italian government and the regional government of Sicily to restitute the treasure under condition to return it to New-York Metropolitan this year for a period of four years. Since it was beyond doubt that the vessels came from the site of Morgantina, the treasure arrived back where it belongs in 2010.

Of course, considering the American point of view, the above deal makes some sense. The Met put down nearly three million dollars during the years 1981-1982 for this Hellenistic silver believed to come from Turkey and wants to cash in on the money spent. But then the Sicilians rightfully say that these unique vessels belong to the place where they were found and should be exhibited at the Museo Regionale di Aidone next to the site of Morgantina. Since November last year, difficult negotiations are taking place to keep this hoard of Eupolemos where it is now in exchange for a possible loan of other artifacts to the Metropolitan. The Met is not commenting on this suggestion although they are at least open for further discussions. Diplomatic responses are being expressed but nothing conclusive so far (See this article in The Art Newspaper).

Thanks to a coin found at the House of Eupolemos, the silverware can be dated to 214-212 BC. These were turbulent years when Carthageand Rome fought each other in the Second Punic War over the supremacy of Sicily. According to Livy, Morgantina was attacked in 211 BC and conquered by the Romans, events that coincides with the time the hoard was hidden. An inscription on a lead-tablet reveals the name of Eupolemos, who is either a high-priest, or the owner or keeper of this precious silverware.  It is probable that when the Roman army entered Morgantina, the silver was buried in the basement of Eupolemos’ house. 

The most striking piece may well be an 11 cm-high miniature silver altar weighing as much as 370 grams and decorated with an Ionic dentil and a Doric frieze of metopes and triglyphs; four ox-heads crowned with a gold star hold the surrounding gilded garland. This altar probably was used for offerings at home, but that is not certain. (More details in this interesting article: “Another thing: Recovered loss – altar from the Morgantina Treasure”).

Beside this special altar, we can admire two large oval bowls for mixing wine; three drinking cups with in their bottom a relief of flowers and leaves; a small cup with fishnet motive (looks like a modern football); a pitcher; a kylix (wide drinking cup with two handles); a phiale (offering-dish) with sunrays; a ladle; two pyxides (round box) one showing a cupid carrying a torch on its lid and the other a lady holding a child on her lap; a magnificent medallion with a picture of Scylla; and two slender horns that probably were part of a leather priest-mask. Several of these objects have inscriptions with dedications to the gods, leading to believe that they were used for libations. 

A closer examination of this silverware has revealed that the vessels were made by artists from Syracuse, making them the only examples of the fine silversmith’s art during the second half third century BC when the city was at the top of its power and prosperity. 

Can you imagine the craftsmanship that existed already in Alexander’s days? Hard to fathom. 

[Click here to see all the pictures from the Morgantina Museum]

A plea for Macedonia

$
0
0
Just watch this short film that appeared under the label “A country without Pella is not Macedonia” – it should be enough to convince anyone …

 

More of the kind can be found on this same site “History of Macedonia”, a proud Macedonian true to his roots.

What Alexander did for us?

$
0
0
Sounds like the BBC program “What the ancients did for us”, right? Well this is a little different for it is about food. 

Oh yes, I read this article about citron, a citrus fruit that has its origins in India. It is a small thorny tree of 2,5 to 4 meters high that grows in the region between Bhutan and Myanmar, along the Brahmaputra River.


It happens that around 300 B.C. soldiers of Alexander the Great brought the fruit back to the West. Meanwhile there seem to be several varieties and the oldest orchards can be found in southern Italy in the region of Calabria, where there is an entire coastline called Riviera dei Cedri. The pulp from the citrons in Calabria and Sicily is rather sour, while that from the trees in Corsica and Morocco is sweet.

Never heard of citrons? Of course, you have! It is the candied peel that we add in our cakes and cookies, or that we coat with chocolate to create the orangettes or citronettes. The French word for it is cédrat, in Dutch cederappel (literally apple from the cedar tree), which in turn is close to cedre the Italian word for it.

Strangely enough, the Italians still serve the fresh fruit in slices with a sprinkle of salt to accompany their aperitifs. We should give it a try, shouldn’t we?

Pella, the birthplace of Alexander the Great

$
0
0
Pella became the capital of Macedonia in the early 4th century BC. The choice for the location is, as always, made with great care. Situated at the mouth of the Axios River the city had a direct access to the sea, although till now the harbor has not yet been located. That is not surprising for today’s Pella lies 25 km land inwards as over the past two thousand years the river has silted up and has covered the remains of the settlement. The land was fertile however sloping up gently towards the mountains which now are part of the Republic Macedonia. Standing here, it is not difficult to mentally erase the houses and roads and imagine what it may have looked like in Alexander’s days with fields of barley, wheat and oats, or rows of olive trees followed by fruit trees, mainly peaches and pomegranate – a garden of Eden.

Any first time visitor to Pella will be struck by the American lay-out of the street plan, all house-blocks of the same size and all streets crossing each other at right angle. The east-west roads were nine meters wide while the north-south streets a mere six meters. A wider ornamental road 15 meters wide ran through the city center to the Agora. Pella knew an excellent water supply and a close look will reveal the underlying functional system with at the crossroad a special earthen urn that collected the dirt and could easily be removed for cleaning. The city counted many wells and fountains, combined with an efficient drainage system.

Excavations are ongoing, with the ups and downs that typically go hand in hand with finances. When I was here the first time in 1973, there were only a few pebble mosaic floors amidst a handful of slender Ionic columns; the most precious mosaics leaning against a shack covered with a piece of roofing. Since then the excavated surface has expanded steadily, and a first small museum housed the earlier exposed mosaics together with marble and terracotta statues among which a head of Alexander as a young prince and a statue representing him as Pan. Most recently a new museum has been built where many more artifacts have joined the collection, now exhibited in chronological order.

The true eye-catchers at the Archeological Museum of Pella are of course the pebble mosaics: a Lion Hunt featuring Alexander and Craterus; Dionysus Seated on a Panther and Carrying the Tyros Staff; a Griffon Attacking a Deer; and a couple of centaurs. As always, I’m entirely taken by the Tanagra statuettes among which those of two ladies playing the lyre; a couple of playful cupids and several heads with ladies showing all sorts of hairdo. From the potters’ quarters there is a wide selection of pots, vases, and other vessels, very representative for their period in time. Striking are the ivory and bone elements from now perished wooden kline or couches that have partially been reconstructed. Further, several golden crowns, a wide choice of silver and gold coins; remains of a frescoed wall from the second century BC; a small marble horseman although decapitated still carrying a proud posture; a marble inlaid round table; etc.

The mosaics of Pella are quite unique since they are mainly made with pebbles of different sizes ranging from white to grey to bluish-grey collected from the nearby beach and arranged in patterns. Here and there a touch of yellow or red is added to enhance the picture and the contours are accentuated using bronze strips. The large mosaic of the Rape of Helena has remained in situ under a protective roof. Such dynamics with the horses in full gallop and the dashing dresses; the edges of the panel are trimmed with palmetto and acanthus motives. The next room is paved with a mosaic showing a Deer Hunt, also in full action. This house alone covers a surface of 3,000 m2. The private houses varied in size and the rooms were arranged around a central courtyard, generally framed by colonnades. Many mosaics have been covered up with sand to protect them, an understandable precaution but very sad to find them hidden from view.

The Agora covering 700 m2 in the heart of Pella underwent thorough restoration, making the lay-out easier to understand with the six-meters-wide surrounding Stoas that gave access to a wide array of workshops and shops selling food, pottery, jewelry and more. On the north side, official buildings have been identified like the Temple of Aphrodite and others supposedly serving the city’s administration. The southwestern side may have housed the archives since many seals used to secure the papyri have been retrieved. 

More houses were uncovered on the south side of the old main road which now runs right through the middle of antique Pella. It is here that the intriguing round Sanctuary of Darron has been identified whose striking mosaic floor has been transferred to the Museum. 

The Royal Palace of Pella where prince Alexander grew up is located further uphill to the north - still within reach of the city. The Palace alone covers an area of 6 ha and was divided into five separate complexes, including beside the living quarters, the necessary storage rooms, rooms reserved for entertainment, service rooms, and even a swimming pool and a pallestra. These complexes were, of course, interconnected by corridors and staircases. The royal family must have occupied the most central part, counting four large buildings around a large open courtyard. It would be interesting to figure out how close Philip’s wives lived to each other, how much space was occupied by the official administration and military management, where the many visiting delegations were lodged, which rooms the King used to receive his guests, etc. 

The Palace was supposed to open to the public in 2011 but at the last moment it was decided to restart more archeological work on the premises. I was not allowed inside but could at least walk all the way around it, taking in the view over the city of Pella and the sea beyond. Behind me the Macedonian landscape was covered with bright spring flowers from the white chamomile and pink hollyhock to the deep red puppies and purple wild onions – an explosion of colours over the rolling hills. It felt like a homecoming, in an intoxicating excitement. The land is pleasantly green, cut through by refreshing clear streams tumbling down from higher elevations under the blue sky filled with fleets of puffy clouds. This is truly the place where Alexander spent his youth!

Like other boys and young men his age, Alexander would have been hunting boar, foxes, lions (who have since long gone) probably in the hills to the north. We have the above-mentioned mosaic of the Lion Hunt with Craterus to illustrate the hunting parties and also the fresco above the Tomb ofPhilip at Aegae (modern Vergina). Hunting was a way to train for war and to develop physical and mental skills. If it were not for his friends, I think Alexander would have had a rather lonely youth since his father was constantly fighting the neighbouring tribes and cities in order to extend and stabilize Macedonia. The young prince grew up with the stories of his father’s campaigns that must have fuelled his imagination based on the legends of Troy he treasured all his life. Around age twelve, Philip invited Aristotle to teach the young prince and even found an appropriate location at the temple of the Nymphs in Mieza.  These probably were the years when Alexander learned the most in many fields, like literature, topography, biology, zoology, botany, ethics, and even meteorology – a knowledge he shared with his boyhood friends such as Hephaistion, Ptolemy and Nearchus[see: Mieza, Alexander's schooling]. Alexander’s interest for medicine must have come from these days with Aristotle, a skill he used throughout his life to treat his sick friends.

Macedonia was not an isolated “Barbarian” country as so often stated, but the court had long been a centre for culture where envoys, refugees, artists, actors and delegates from all around the Mediterranean spent time. Alexander’s knowledge of the world extended thus far beyond his homeland and immediate neighbours and he must have had quite a broad insight of what was going on in other parts of the ancient world. Theopompus of Chios who later on wrote a History of Philip was one of the visitors. Envoys from Sparta, Thebes, Thessaly and Phocis found their way to Pella. Athens sent several ambassadors to the capital to end the successive Sacred Wars and we know that negotiators like Demosthenes, Aeschines, Philocrates and Nausicles participated in these missions. More significantly was the presence of Artabazus II, satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia who revolted the Persian rule and found refuge at Philip’s court. He spent several years there with his wives and children, among which his eldest daughter Barsine. She was about seven years older than Alexander and we know how they met again many years later when she became his mistress and even bore him a son, Heracles. 

When Philip appointed his 16-year old son as Regent while he went fighting in the east, Alexander must have realized how much his father trusted him and at the same time that he recognized him as official heir to the throne. These feelings were stressed again two years later during the Battle ofChaeronea where Alexander not alone proved his leadership and capability in military matter at the head of the cavalry but he crushed the Sacred Band of Thebes that was known to be invincible; this must have boosted his ego to an even higher level. Alexander must have felt ready to take command, not only of the army but maybe also of the kingdom. Realizing, however, that his father was “only” in his mid-forties and that he would have to wait a very long time to take over his tasks must have been hard to accept. He would have to live in the shadow of his powerful father for another twenty years at least.

Shortly afterwards, some worrying situations developed. Philip married for the seventh time, this time with the niece of one of his leading generals, Attalus, who during the wedding feast proclaimed that Macedonia would at last have a legitimate heir to the throne! Alexander’s mothers was from Epirus which meant that Alexander was only half Macedonian. Alexander was enraged by Attalus’ remark and asked his father to reprimand his general. He did not and Alexander promptly left the Macedonian court with his mother. He trusted her into her brother’s care, Alexandros of Epirus while he joined the Illyrians, making Philip worry about his earlier peace-treaty with them. When the King sobered up, he realized that he had to recall his son, which he did through the intervention of Demaratus of Corinth, a common friend. He also had to make up with his brother-in-law to avoid a possible revolt in next door Epirus. To this purpose he offered his own daughter in marriage to his wife’s brother, meaning that Alexander’s sister was to marry her uncle. It was during this wedding feast that King Philip II of Macedonia was murdered. 

By the time Alexander celebrated his twentieth birthday, another drama unfolded at the Macedonian court. Philip was approached by Pixodarus of Caria for a marriage alliance. Philip put his eldest (half-witted) son Arrhideus forward to marry Ada, the younger daughter of Pixodarus. When Alexander heard the news he felt overlooked and secretly sent the tragic actor Thessalus to renegotiate the deal presenting himself instead of Arrhideus. When Philip got vent of this plot behind his back, it was his turn to be furious for he was still King and ruler of Macedonia, not his son. As a punishment, he exiled a group of Alexander’s closest friends – among them Nearchus, Ptolemy, Harpalus and Erigyius – and warned his son not to interfere in his plans ever again. It is known that Alexander rewarded his friends later on for their loyalty with high positions in his army. 

A few months later, the wedding of Cleopatra and Alexandros of Epirus was to be celebrated at Aegae in great pomp. This is when KingPhilipIIwas murdered. Alexander became the new king of Macedonia. This story will be tackled next under the title, Aegae, where the world changed forever.
Viewing all 1040 articles
Browse latest View live